On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 12:43 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 12:36 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > This also fixes an error where the default value was not respecting
> > the KEY_LENGTH variable.
> > 
> > (NOTE: the os.urandom() change should not change the security properties
> > of the existing code. However, the failure of the previous code to
> > respect KEY_LENGTH causes us to violate the RFC.)
> 
> LGTM!
> I do prefer using os.urandom() directly, as random.SystemRandom uses it
> under the hood anyway.

Is that an ACK? Because we need to merge a fix of some kind soon.

Nathaniel

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to