It looks like ipa-getkeytab error message for a non-existent service
changed.
Simo, is this expected?
Is the new message final, or should we just check for the "PrincipalName
not found." substring?
--
Petr³
From f4c2b789efcdc5c9c9f33de89040b042bfe2898d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:25:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test_ipagetkeytab: Fix expected error message
---
ipatests/test_cmdline/test_ipagetkeytab.py | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ipatests/test_cmdline/test_ipagetkeytab.py b/ipatests/test_cmdline/test_ipagetkeytab.py
index ee2fdecf041c2af14c435db0f93493cd49a3999b..5d8708241ad6a8941f5c340769c1097ee322a5cf 100644
--- a/ipatests/test_cmdline/test_ipagetkeytab.py
+++ b/ipatests/test_cmdline/test_ipagetkeytab.py
@@ -86,7 +86,10 @@ def test_1_run(self):
"-k", self.keytabname,
]
(out, err, rc) = ipautil.run(new_args, stdin=None, raiseonerr=False)
- assert err == 'Operation failed! PrincipalName not found.\n\n'
+ assert err == (
+ 'Failed to parse result! PrincipalName not found.\n\n'
+ 'Failed to get keytab\n'
+ ), err
def test_2_run(self):
"""
--
1.9.3
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
