On 09/24/2014 06:19 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:00:21AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote: >> >> I just rebuilt latest fixed pki-core&tomcat for our Copr >> (http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mkosek/freeipa/builds/). We are now very >> close to having a functional repo for RHEL/CentOS 7.0. >> >> With couple minor changes to the spec file, I was able to install FreeIPA >> 4.0.3 > > What will be the content of these yum repos going forward? Will > they be fixated at 4.0.3, or will they always contain the latest > greatest release?
My current vision for this Copr was for it to have the latest greatest stable (-ish) FreeIPA versino. I.e. as soon as we release 4.1, it would contain 4.1 and it's dependencies. > Would it make sense to create one copr repo per > release, versioned, so that even when 4.0.4 or 4.1.0 is out, the > 4.0.3 content is still available? It makes sense, yes - especially if there would be an interest in this from our users or your Docker use cases - given the maintenance burden. We can build some semi-automatism around it though to make the maintenance easier, I myself have some scripts ready to handle the builds. > I'd like to use these yum repos for Docker images and I wonder what > naming I should use for the branches and tags -- centos-7-upstream, > centos-7-4.0.3, or something else? centos-7-latest (with mkosek/freeipa copr) centos-7-4-0 (with potential future mkosek/freeipa-4-0 copr) centos-7-4-1 (with potential future mkosek/freeipa-4-1 copr) Makes sense? Martin _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipafirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel