On 09/24/2014 06:22 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 24/09/14 17:30, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/24/2014 04:55 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> Patch attached
>>> This probably should go to 4.0.x, 4.1 and master
>> It is obvious that this interface was designed this way. So you should
>> elaborate more on the "should" part, list use cases where current approach 
>> does
>> not work, link to tickets, ...
> Sorry for that, I though I broke it during refactoring.

Not so fast, pardner :-) I checked with 3.3.3 and this *was* indeed changed
during your refactoring. My main point was that you should be clear about your
intents and reasons for the patch, that a mere "should" is not clear to 

ACK to your patch though, works fine and restores the behavior - time to add
tests?. I just adjusted the commit message a little before pushing.

Pushed to:
master: 2f1f1221701160ebeb4f23078adce3af59892162
ipa-4-1: 7a99f22ee0a4c5fd1d41722fa0101fee74e0c76e
ipa-4-0: 32b6eb5110b2f851fbedb39ac0d853b46087465f


Freeipa-devel mailing list

Reply via email to