On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:17:46 -0400 Rob Crittenden <[email protected]> wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:21:57 +0200 > > Ludwig Krispenz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> we already have ipa-replica-manage and ipa-csreplica-manage, and > >> - I did'n want to integrate the topology management into both and > >> duplicate code > >> - there is much change on the way to refactor the ipa commands, to > >> move code into libraries, to expose to openLMI > >> and I have no clear picture yet how this will look like, so I > >> thought implementing the management command as subclasses of > >> admintool would be a good starting point - I do not insist that > >> ipa-topology-manage will survive as a command in the end, but I > >> also do not want to mess with ipa-replica-manage and > >> ipa-csreplica-manage now, when these changes also probably would > >> have no future. > > > > The ideal outcome is to have commands in the admintools indeed. > > I thought the ideal was to have this in the framework so it was > manageable via the UI, which the admin tools are not. Isn't that one > of the main drivers for this reorganization? And to not require DM for > anything? Sorry I had a brain fart, I wrote admintools, but I meant ipa tool. That's really non-negotiable to me, as we want this stuff to be available in the UI, and we do not want to end up maintaining 2 sets of tools that do the same things. Thank you for pointing that out Rob ! Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
