I do not much to add to the process itself. After first reading it seems
pretty heavyweight but let's try it, it can be refined at any time :-)

On 19.3.2015 08:57, Martin Kosek wrote:
> Test Coverage: yes/no/in progress/ /
I'm very much in favor of more descriptive names like:
covered/not necessary/test in works/undecided

It would allow random walkers by (like me :-) to understand what is going on
without necessity to study some internal processes.

Petr^2 Spacek

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to