On 03/26/2015 05:06 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 16:47 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
...
>> Reference:
>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2015-March/msg00158.html
> 
> I see how the language I sued may be confusing. But I was pointing out
> only that you can't just do one or the other you have to support all
> these cases, I wasn't advocating using UTC as the "timezoned" option.
> 
> If I should choose I would support all three flavors:
> - the special "Local Time" string
> - the Olson database (Europe/Rome)
> - absolute UTC offsets (UTC+4)

Yup, makes sense.

> However I would not publicize the latter much in the UI, as it is rarely
> what the admin really should do.



-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to