On 04/06/2015 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 12:15 +0200, David Kupka wrote:
On 03/30/2015 07:12 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 28.3.2015 v 00:05 Petr Vobornik napsal(a):
On 27.3.2015 14:58, David Kupka wrote:
pylint changed slightly so we must react otherwise we'll be unable to
build freeipa rpms on Fedora 22. This patch should go to master for sure
but I don't know if we want it in 4.1.


Are all the new disables really just false positives?

It seems to me as a false positives.

1. ipalib/plugins/otptoken.py:552: [E1101(no-member),
otptoken_sync.forward] Module 'ssl' has no 'PROTOCOL_TLSv1' member)

  >>> import ssl
  >>> ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1

2. ipaserver/install/ipa_otptoken_import.py:63: [E1101(no-member),
convertDate] Instance of 'tuple' has no 'tzinfo' member)
ipaserver/install/ipa_otptoken_import.py:64: [E1101(no-member),
convertDate] Instance of 'tuple' has no 'timetuple' member)

dateutil.parser.parse() returns datetime.datetime object and it has
both tzinfo and timetuple methods

3. ipapython/dnssec/ldapkeydb.py:26: [E1127(invalid-slice-index),
uri_escape] Slice index is not an int, None, or instance with __index__)

This is the line lint is complaining about:
out += '%'.join(hexval[i:i+2] for i in range(0, len(hexval), 2))
I don't see a chance for 'i' or 'i+1' to be anything else than integers.

tested on:
- F21: ipa-4-1, master branch
- F22: master branch.

IMHO it could got to ipa-4-1 branch because of FreeIPA 4.1.4 in F22

This patch doesn't seem to fix all my issues building on F22, so
tentative NACK.

I tested it this way:
1. started with Fedora-22-x86_64-minimal system
2. dnf install git
3. clone freeipa
4. make version-update # to get freeipa.spec
5. dnf install `awk '/^BuildRequires/ {print $2}' freeipa.spec`
6. ./make-lint

It seem the main offenders are "No value for argument 'second' in method
call" (this one only in test_ipautul.py) and "No value for argument
'extClass' in method call" sprinkled around various test plugins.
These cause E1120(no-value-for-parameter).

Could you please paste the output of make-lint somewhere?

On a different note, make-lint takes forever to run, do we really need
to run it in make rpms ? Shouldn't we rather just run it at make dist
time, or whatever we use to generate the release tarballs ?

It really takes forever and it would be nice to move it out of Makefile's rpms target but I don't know if we can do it without breaking anything.


David Kupka

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to