On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 15:47 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote: > Dne 27.5.2015 v 15:43 Simo Sorce napsal(a): > > On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 13:57 +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote: > >>>> > >>>> ipa config-mod --enable-kdcproxy=TRUE > >>>> ipa config-mod --enable-kdcproxy=FALSE > >> > >> I don't like this approach, as it is completely inconsistent with > >> every > >> other optional component. There should be *one* way to handle them > >> and > >> there already is one, no need to reinvent the wheel. > > > > Sorry Jan, but this is really the correct approach. > > I don't think so. > > > > > We want a boolean in LDAP to control whether the IPA Domain allows > > proxying or not, the code is embedded in the overall framework and has > > no need for explicit install/uninstall unlike the CA or DNS components. > > There is a boolean for every other component/service as well. If you > want to add new API to manipulate the boolean, fine, but it should be > done in a generic way that works for other components as well.
This is the same as: ipa config-mod --enable-migration=TRUE Why is it a problem ? This is not a separate service. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code