On 06/12/2015 04:18 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
1. As mentioned in the WIP patch thread: original 'del' worked also
with winsync agreements. I'm not sure why is that. Shouldn't
'disconnect' be used for winsync agreements? At least man page says
that. This patch doesn't support it if domain level > 0. Is it a blocker?
Following should be addressed in beta:
2. If `ipa-replica-manage del` is run before `ipa-csreplica-manage
del` then the `ipa-csreplica-manage del` will fail unless run with
3. Check for orphaned server is missing. I want to use proper graph
traversing algorithm for that given that we have the whole topology.
4. Probably a work for topology plugin: I've seen that the removed
master doesn't remove its segments and agreements even though that it
knows about its removal (doesn't have its own entry in cn=masters). It
leads to failed replication connection attempts. Not a big issue, but
also not wanted.
4. is tough. it also depends on where you remove the master entry.
the removal of the master entry triggers the removal of the segments,
which triggers the removal of the agreement, and the agreement could be
removed before the segment removal is replicated (it is a race).
So, on purpose, the removal of the segments is only triggered on the
servers in the remaining topology, it also will remove the credentials
of the removed replica, so it will no longer be able to replicate back
into the remaining topology.
The assumption was that a removed replica will be really removed and
focus was, remove any info on the removed replica from the remaining
topology and prevent any updates from the removed replica.
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code