Dne 20.7.2015 v 15:33 Martin Babinsky napsal(a):
On 07/17/2015 01:00 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 15/07/15 18:13, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 15.7.2015 17:39, Martin Basti wrote:
On 15/07/15 17:38, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 15.7.2015 17:33, Martin Basti wrote:
On 15/07/15 16:03, Martin Basti wrote:
On 15/07/15 15:39, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/15/2015 02:42 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
Patch attached.

       https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4934
       https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5055

Why are you adding RP, APL, IPSEC, DHCID, HIP, SPF records? Is
there a plan
to use them? Can't we just not use unsupported records in
LDAPSearch'?
(which would fix #5055)
I had discussion with Petr2, and we decided to do it this way,
because these
records are valid.

Removing unsupported records from search changes the behavior of
the DNS
commands. Now IPA shows even unsupported records which cannot be
modified by
API. AFAIK we want to keep this behavior.

Updated patch attached.

I forgot to remove DNSKEY from object class definition.
Are you 100 % sure that it will not break on upgrade? Please
double-check that
with Thierry.

IT was my change before we decided that DNSKEY should not be there,
it is not
in git repo.
I see, okay.

Updated patch attached.



ACK

Pushed to:
master: 5ea41abe9836c94579115f9b220a8205b15d520d
ipa-4-2: bb6498547e1d638a064e4af259e195b7b95288b3

--
Jan Cholasta

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to