On 2015-08-12 18:10, Tomas Babej wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 05:39 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> On 08/03/2015 11:07 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
>>> On 2015-07-31 19:14, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Here is a batch of mostly mechanical changes: removing deprecated
>>>> features to prepare for Python 3.
>>> Out of curiosity, what tool did you use for patch 695-absolute-imports?
>>> Python-modernize adds from __future__ import absolute_imports and
>>> changes imports to explicit relative imports.
>> I used modernize to find all the occurences, and fixed imports by hand.
>> Most of IPA uses absolute imports, as recommended by PEP 8.
>>> In patch 693 you have removed test cases for CIDict.has_key(), but
>>> CIDict still provides the function. You should either keep the tests
>>> around or remove has_key() from CIDict.
>> I haven't removed them: "test_haskey" is only skipped under Python 3. I
>> assumed that's enough to verify that `has_key` works well (i.e. the same
>> as `in`), so in the other tests I do use `in` instead.
>> I'm attaching updated patches, under Python 3 they remove CIDict.has_key
>> a bit more formally. They're also rebased.
>>> The rest looks good to me, but I haven't studied every change
>>> thoroughly. It's just too much.
>> Anything I can do to help?
> Let's not sit on this for too long, it will a pain to rebase. I went
> through the gargatuan patches manually and did not discover any issues.
> Additionally, the patchset introduces no new unit-test failures.
> So I am inclined to ACK it, unless Christian has any objections.

I've skimmed over the patches and didn't find any issues, too.

pylint --py3k is going to complain about missing from __future__ import
absolute_import lines. We can add them later, though.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to