On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,

Is anyone using repos
https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
?

AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
outside the Brno.

Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
maintenance window could be a good time to do that.

I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The

The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.

That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.

The 7 hits I found was for
/ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm 
and
other packages from the same version.

I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
(except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
- 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
- 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
- remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata

It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.

Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)
Yes, I think we can decommission this repository thanks to COPR
infrastructure.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to