On 27.11.2015 08:33, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/27/2015 07:05 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 26.11.2015 17:15, Petr Vobornik wrote:
New topology management gives names to managed suffixes:

ipaca: o=ipaca
realm: dc=example,dc=com

We already had several offline discussions to change the names because
they could be better. It would be difficult to change them after release
of 4.3.

New proposals:
ca for o=ipaca
domain for dc=example,dc=com

What do you think?

+1

ca is probably fine. Domain also, although the original realm name is OK
with me too, domain has too many meanings and can be confused with DNS
domain.

Realm is too Kerberos-specific. The names are visible only in topology context, so I don't think it would be confusing. When you say "the domain suffix", it describes the suffix pretty correctly IMHO.

--
Jan Cholasta

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to