On 27.11.2015 08:33, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/27/2015 07:05 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 26.11.2015 17:15, Petr Vobornik wrote:
New topology management gives names to managed suffixes:
We already had several offline discussions to change the names because
they could be better. It would be difficult to change them after release
ca for o=ipaca
domain for dc=example,dc=com
What do you think?
ca is probably fine. Domain also, although the original realm name is OK
with me too, domain has too many meanings and can be confused with DNS
Realm is too Kerberos-specific. The names are visible only in topology
context, so I don't think it would be confusing. When you say "the
domain suffix", it describes the suffix pretty correctly IMHO.
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code