On 27.11.2015 09:00, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> On 27.11.2015 08:33, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 11/27/2015 07:05 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> On 26.11.2015 17:15, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>> New topology management gives names to managed suffixes:
>>>>
>>>> ipaca: o=ipaca
>>>> realm: dc=example,dc=com
>>>>
>>>> We already had several offline discussions to change the names because
>>>> they could be better. It would be difficult to change them after release
>>>> of 4.3.
>>>>
>>>> New proposals:
>>>> ca for o=ipaca
>>>> domain for dc=example,dc=com
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> ca is probably fine. Domain also, although the original realm name is OK
>> with me too, domain has too many meanings and can be confused with DNS
>> domain.
> 
> Realm is too Kerberos-specific. The names are visible only in topology
> context, so I don't think it would be confusing. When you say "the domain
> suffix", it describes the suffix pretty correctly IMHO.

Here I agree with Martin that domain is too overloaded term, so I would prefer
realm or so.

Also, I do not think that 'Realm is too Kerberos-specific' is a valid argument
because 'domain is too DNS-centric' :-)

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to