On 4.12.2015 14:29, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 3.12.2015 17:32, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This specfile patch makes python-ipalib noarch, by splitting out the
I'm not sure if this should be done at all. Both py_default_encoding and
(especially) _ipap11helper are internal submodules of ipapython and I
don't think they should be packaged separately.
If this is just about packaging arch-specific code separately from
noarch code, I'm not sure either - all other packages with both Python
and C modules I have seen (e.g. python-ldap, PyYAML) simply do not care
and put everything in a single arch-specific package. IMHO we should
This would mean putting everything into the architecture-specific
prefix. Currently the python files in python2-ipalib are installed into
the architecture-agnostic prefix, which is wrong, because you can't
install both python2-ipalib.i686 and python2-ipalib.x86_64 at the same time.
It depends on Honza Cholasta's patches 516 and 517.
FYI the patches were pushed on Friday.
Part of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3197
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code