On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:30:40PM +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 03:20 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:31:55PM +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> >>On 02/16/2016 02:23 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> >>>Hi list,
> >>>
> >>>WARNING: huge brain dump ahead.
> >>>
> >>>During investigation of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4305 me
> >>>and Petr Spaced (CC'ed) came to a conclusion that the IPA realm
> >>>autodiscovery code used by ipa-client-install is so convoluted, complex
> >>>and hard to understand that the cost of fixing a bug/adding a behavioral
> >>>change (there are some other tickets dealing with ipadiscovery, e.g. see
> >>>https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5270
> >>>https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3912 ) can potentially be higher
> >>>that a more large-scale rewrite of the module and related codebase.
> >>>
> >>>Since we plan to do some general refactoring work anyway, I would like
> >>>to discuss the possible course of action we may take to tackle this
> >>>issue. I would like to present the following options we have been
> >>>discussing so far:
> >>>
> >>>1.) Do a substantial rewrite of existing code ("ipaclient/ipadiscovery.py")
> >>>
> >>>We may take the existing IPADiscovery class and try rewrite it in order
> >>>to get a more concise and deterministic code, which will:
> >>>
> >>>* rely more on python-dns and answers provided by resolver (e.g. we are
> >>>directly parsing resolv.conf for available domains when we can ask the
> >>>resolver to get domains for us)
> >>>* be more pythonic (replace error codes with thrown exceptions, clean up
> >>>numerous C-isms etc.)
> >>>* not try to outsmart user when server/realm/domain is specified
> >>>beforehand. Currently, even if you specify all three options, there is
> >>>still some DNS discovery performed, hence bug #4305. I think that one
> >>>you specify server(s), not magic should be performed and the discovery
> >>>process should be reduced to checking whether they are IPA servers and
> >>>pull all other info (like realm) from them.
> >>>
> >>>This may be a considerable effort requiring some time to implement and
> >>>get right, but IMHO still comparable to the time spent iteratively
> >>>placing 'if' statements into the existing code and hoping to not break
> >>>anything. I would even argue it is not worth the effort because we can
> >>>
> >>>2.) Use realmd dbus interface to do DNS discovery
> >>>
> >>>I have attached aquick and dirty script I have slapped together to
> >>>leverage 'org.freedesktop.realmd.Discover' interface to do IPA realm
> >>>discovery for us. This has a lot of appeal to me since we are leveraging
> >>>existing codebase for DNS discovery and will have to handle only cases
> >>>when the user manually specifies a list of IPA servers for the client.
> >>>
> >>>This however pulls in realmd as a (potentially circular) dependency for
> >>>ipa client, and when we find bug in the discovery code, we will have to
> >>>poke upstream (Stef or Sumit I think) to fix it.
> >>>
> >>>So from the long-term point of view, Jan Cholasta's (CC'ed) suggestion to:
> >>>
> >>>3.) Split out IPA discovery portion of realmd to a separate C library
> >>>shared between IPA and realmd
> >>>
> >>>may be best. Both projects will have shared codebase (maintained either
> >>>by us or realmd devs), which can be reused also by other people to
> >>>create their own discovery/enrollment solution. This would however
> >>>require sustained and concerted efforts of both teams to create the
> >>>library and possibly rewrite realmd to accommodate this change.
> >>>
> >>>There may be some other options viable for us, if so please mention them
> >>>in a reply. Also please correct any piece of information I got wrong.
> >>>
> >>>TL;DR: IPA realm/domain discovery is a mess, please suggest a way to fix
> >>>it.
> >>>
> >>
> >>#3 sounds good from long term perspective.
> >>
> >>In short term, i.e., #4305, we should skip discovery when --on-master is
> >>used.
> >
> >I would prefer #2. Because as seen from the patch it is already working
> >and can easily be used from python. I think this was also one of the
> >reasons why Stef used a DBus service for this instead of a C library
> >which then needs various bindings for python, Java, ruby, Go you name
> >it.
> >
> This approach is also my favorite. However, my (and several of my
> colleagues) concern is that
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271551 will break it in
> kickstart environment. I don't know how much of an issue is this, I guess it
> completely precludes automatic enrollment during machine provisioning.

realmd has the --dbus-peer option. So I guess it might be possible that
realmd can be started by ipa-client-install directly in this case and
allow communication over a socket pair. I'm not sure how hard or easy
this would be in python.

Stef, do you have some pointers how to use dbus-peer from python?


> >About the concerns. rpm-wise realmd has no dependencies on its
> >underlying tools, it will tell which packages must be installed to do
> >the join or will use packagekit to install them on its own. So it is
> >safe to add a realmd dependency to the ipa-client package. And as long
> >as you only use the Discover method realmd would not try to call
> >ipa-client-install, so there is no logical circle either. To avoid an
> >un-needed second discovery when ipa-client-install is not run from the
> >command line but from realmd directly ipa-client-install can skip the
> >realmd call if domain and realm are already given on the command line
> >because realmd will set both options when calling ipa-client-install.
> >And if there is a bug you have to poke the maintainer of the library or
> >realmd either way.
> >
> >
> >
> >bye,
> >Sumit
> >
> >
> >>--
> >>Petr Vobornik
> >>
> >>--
> >>Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
> >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
> >>Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
> >
> -- 
> Martin^3 Babinsky

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to