On 25.2.2016 11:03, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 02/15/2016 05:39 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (15/02/16 17:00), Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 02/15/2016 04:37 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
Reflect the updated name of the package.

Seems to me as a packaging bug in python-polib. It should use
python_provide
macro to handle the transition.
There is not a bug in python-polib

sh# rpm -q python2-polib
python2-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23.noarch

sh# rpm -q --provides python2-polib
python-polib = 1.0.7-2.fc23
python2-polib = 1.0.7-2.fc23

However it is a change in behaviour in dnf/yum.
You can see more details in BZ1291850 or better BZ1096506.

This a readon why "dnf builddep" will try to remove package.
(it's not downgrade from dnf point of view)

sh# dnf builddep freeipa.spec
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:17:37 ago on Mon Feb 15
16:19:14
2016.
Package python-setuptools-18.0.1-2.fc23.noarch is already installed,
skipping.
Package systemd-222-10.fc23.x86_64 is already installed, skipping.
Package systemd-222-10.fc23.x86_64 is already installed, skipping.
Error: installed package python2-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23.noarch obsoletes
python-polib < 1.0.7-2.fc23 provided by python-polib-1.0.3-6.fc23.noarch
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages)


You might try to file a dnf BZ but mine 1291850 was two tiles closed
as not a
but and then closed as a duplicate of another bug.

IMHO the simplest solution would to push the patch with better
explanation
in's a workaround.

LSommit message becuase it's a workaround.

LS
Updated patch with reworded commit message.

Please also add "workaround for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506"; comment above the changed requires.

--
Jan Cholasta

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to