I'm trying to implement both tickets, but I don't like the way we
decided on devel meeting anymore.
ipa host-del --updatedns
I propose to only delete A, AAAA and related PTR records (SSHFP records
explained later). The record are somehow managed by IPA
I don't like the idea of having an extra option to specify record types
that should be removed or a flag that will remove DNS entry completely.
IMO that is duplication of dnsrecord-mod/del functionality, host-del
should not be used for managing DNS. If somebody wants better
granularity, the one should use 'dnsrecord-mod zone rec --type-rec=' or
Note: due backward compatibility --updatedns cannot be migrated to ENUM,
new option needed
SSHFP records and host-del (https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5715)
host-del removes SSH keys from LDAP, thus there is no reason to keep
SSHFP record in DNS, thus SSHFP records should be removed always (even
without --updatedns option)
SSHFP record are always added via nsupdate to DNS, IMO during client
uninstall all SSHFP record related to client should be removed via
ipa-client-install --uninstall --delete-host #suggestions how to name
option for removing host entry for ldap welcome
Should this option call 'host-del' or 'host-del --updatedns'?
I would like to avoid additional DNS related option to be added to
Also do we really want to implement this ticket? What is the gain there?
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code