On 03/18/2016 02:44 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 03/18/2016 10:59 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/18/2016 10:47 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/18/2016 10:21 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/17/2016 06:16 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
Hi list,
here is a link (http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Server_Roles) to WIP
design
document concerning the concept of Server Roles as a user-friendly
abstraction
of the services running on IPA masters.
The main aim of this feature is to provide a higher level interface
to query
and manipulate service-related information stored in dirsrv backend.
I have not touched the design much from the post-Devconf session,
mainly
because there are some points to clarify and agree upon.
Initial thoughts:
* Use Cases: these are rather vague points what you want to
implement. In Use
Case section, I would like to see what specific *user* use cases you
are
addressing, i.e. what user problems you are solving. Ideally in a
form of a
user story. Like here:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/User_Life-Cycle_Management#Use_Cases
or here:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Authentication_Indicators#Use_Cases
or here:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/External_trust_to_AD#Use_Cases
Ok I will thing of some clearer points.
I have the following points to discuss:
1.) the design assumes that there is a distinction between roles
such as DNS
server, CA, etc. and the more specific sub-roles such as DNSSec key
master, CRL
master, etc. Now in the hindsight I think this distinction is quite
artificial
and just clutters the interface unnecessarily. We might implement
this kind of
hierarchy in the code itself but that is something the user needs
not be
aware of.
Well, there are dependencies. A server cannot be a CRL master
without also
being a CA role. I assume same applies to DNSSEC master.
I think we need to think more about distinguishing what is role,
what is just
an attribute of a role, etc. AD for example distinguishes roles,
role service
and features:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754923.aspx
We will have to implement the role/subrole/unicorn hierarchy anyhow.
What I
would like to discuss is whether it is necessary to expose this
hierarchy to
the users. Consider a case when user wants to find which server is a
CA renewal
master:
ipa server-role-find "CA renewal master"
vs.
ipa server-role-find --subrole "Renewal master"
Behind the scenes, the code has to do the same thing (e.g. issue a
search using
(&(cn=CA)(ipaConfigString=enabledService)(ipaConfigString=caRenewalMaster))),
but the UX is a bit different.
Well, even the LDAP structure is different in this case. CA role is an
object
in cn=masters, caRenewalMaster is it's property. So they will likely be
different user objects too.
For your example, I can image a search like that:
$ ipa server-role-find "CA" --subrole "renewal-master"
(for the case when you have "DNS" role also with "renewal-master"
sub-role).
Martin
I don't have a strong option about this matter.
Number of roles will be limited. I don't see any point in developing
hierarchies in CLI/API/Web UI. Simply describing the roles and their
dependencies in server-role help should be enough.
Hierarchy and dependency should be checked internally.
Question is how it should behave in practice. There is no example in the
design page. Imagine these use cases:
$ server-role-find
"CA"
"CA renewal master"
"DNS server"
"DNSSec Key Master"
...
maybe is should print also description, but help might be enough.
$ server-role-find
===
Certificate Authority
Manages certificate requests and revocation...
(optionally list masters)
Enabled on: master1.ipa.test, replica3.ipa.test
===
DNS Server
manages forward and reverse name resolution
Enabled on: master1.ipa.test
===
CA renewal master
Manages automatic renewal of certificates nearing expiration
Enabled on: replica3.ipa.test
...
$ ipa server-role-enable $SERVER "CA renewal master"
Error: Server must have a "CA" role.
$ ipa server-role-enable $SERVER "CA"
Error: run ipa-ca-install on $SERVER to enable the CA role
Note: if in future we implement a privileged daemon then the
installation can be done by the daemon.
# ipa-ca-install
$ ipa server-role-enable $SERVER "CA"
INFO: Server already in CA role
$ server-show $SERVER
...
Roles: DNS Server, CA
...
$ ipa server-role-enable $SERVER "CA renewal master"
SUCCESS: $server is now "CA renewal master"
INFO: "CA renewal master" role was unset from $SERVER_PREVIOUS
What is a purpose of `ipa server-role-disable`?
As an administrator I need to hide a misbehaving CA master from the
topology so that CSRs are not forwarded to it. E.g.
'role_disable' can be also called internally when a 'singular' role
(renewal master) is migrated to other master.
If in future we need to configure a role then:
$ ipa server-role-mod $SERVER $ROLE --fooattr=value (this is not
supported in FW now because the attrs might differ based on $ROLE)
--
Martin^3 Babinsky
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
