On 11.3.2016 09:32, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/11/2016 07:24 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 9.3.2016 11:14, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/07/2016 04:28 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/07/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.3.2016 13:27, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,

On 7.3.2016 12:47, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5696

Shouldn't we rather fix IPA to work with bind running in chroot
(which is
AFAIK considered good security practice)?

I would not invest into it:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/Howto/FreeIPA_with_integrated_BIND_inside_chroot#NOTE:_Chroot_should_not_be_considered_a_security_feature




+1

Martin


Then the patch should be sufficient, yes?

Yes, but I would prefer if the directive was visually separated from
requires and had a comment (see how nss-pam-ldapd conflicts in
freeipa-server is done).

Fixed

Thanks, ACK.

Pushed to:
master: 3ab63fa6ba60947b1452c2108c4cf7637f4aacdb
ipa-4-3: 2b1b9ad6722e7008a97f09dc4a34019ad250cd4d


--
Jan Cholasta

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to