Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/04/16 16:42), Rob Crittenden wrote:
Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (21/04/16 19:25), Petr Vobornik wrote:
related but does not implement https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5806
--
Petr Vobornik
From b9b8716ec9ba5a5cdbed1f6cdedf7cff8878f08f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Vobornik <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:23:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ipa-client-install: fix typo in nslcd service name
related but does not implement https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5806
---
client/ipa-client-install | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/client/ipa-client-install b/client/ipa-client-install
index
c38843f85639a9118cd1a471709992690643d79a..0e6e65c4ad4ce01fe1257eee4bb2633a70c3de4e
100755
--- a/client/ipa-client-install
+++ b/client/ipa-client-install
@@ -2938,7 +2938,7 @@ def install(options, env, fstore, statestore):
nscd.service_name)
nslcd = services.knownservices.nslcd
- if nscd.is_installed():
+ if nslcd.is_installed():
save_state(nslcd)
I thought that milestone "Future Releases" has lower priority
then "FreeIPA 4.4 Backlog"
Therefore I would prefer to close ticket #5806 and implement following one
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5557#comment:2
I don't understand what you are suggesting. Tickets aren't swapped like this
and certainly non-related bugs aren't closed for another.
This patch just fixes an obvious one-liner as agreed upon in triage. The rest
will be potentially addressed later.
ACK on the patch.
I cannot see a reason to fix oneliner.
This code is not tested and should be removed (#5557)
I fail to see the controversy here. These are two completely and
absolutely unrelated bugs.
Or someone should write integration test.
I'm sorry but conditional-NACK (missing integration test)
I've been out of the project a while, so perhaps my knowledge is stale,
but AFAIU upstream QE writes the integration tests, not the developers.
This was at least true when I was a daily contributor.
At least at one time QE did testing using --no-sssd. Whether that is
still the case I don't know but I do remember fixing bugs around it. And
this particular bug might not be immediately apparent unless a specific
configuration was present. I noticed the bug while reading code, not in
production.
rob
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
