On 19.05.2016 09:30, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 05/19/2016 08:52 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Thank you, Ludwig. It seems reasonable to have the option set to 'yes'
all the time, then.
On 05/19/2016 08:02 AM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
this is a theoretical concern that there might be changes from the
replica to be removed which are not yet on all servers, but to me the
problem that cleaning ruvs hangs because replicas cannot be reached
is the worse scenario.
On 05/18/2016 04:44 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 05/18/2016 04:36 PM, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
There's no ticket for this patch but as there was a fix to 389-ds
mentioned in https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5396, the TODO
section in clean_dangling_ruvs could be removed.
What about using
Is there a drawback which we would like to avoid?
The DS website mentions two possible risks
- possible loss of changes on deleted replica should these have not
been reflected to some other replicas
- if some offline replica comes back online, it may re-pollute the
there have been fixes in 389-ds to prevent the repollution, so it
should no longer happen.
I'm not sure of the probability of the second scenario, in my rather
simple environment the re-pollution did not happen.
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code