On 06/10/2016 10:01 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09.06.2016 21:45, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09.06.2016 17:56, Martin Babinsky wrote:
>>>> On 06/06/2016 01:37 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>>>>> On 6.6.2016 13:22, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06.06.2016 13:14, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 06.06.2016 12:36, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> MS-ADTS spec requires that TrustPartner field should be equal to the
>>>>>>>>>> commonName (cn) of the trust. We used it a bit wrongly to express
>>>>>>>>>> trust relationship between parent and child domains. In fact, we
>>>>>>>>>> have parent-child relationship recorded in the DN (child domains
>>>>>>>>>> are part of the parent domain's container).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Remove the argument that was never used externally but only
>>>>>>>>>> supplied by
>>>>>>>>>> trust-specific code inside the IPA framework.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Part of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5354
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello, how is handled backward compatibility here, you just removes
>>>>>>>>> the option from API, without any additional logic for older clients.
>>>>>>>> This is not used by the external clients at all. It is part of internal
>>>>>>>> logic of the code in trust.py+com.redhat.trust.fetch-domains which
>>>>>>>> always talk to the same server they are running on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @register()
>>>>>>>> class trustdomain_add(LDAPCreate):
>>>>>>>>  __doc__ = _('Allow access from the trusted domain')
>>>>>>>>  NO_CLI = True
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes sorry, not old IPA clients, but it was part of API, shown in API
>>>>>>> browser, and since this was in API, it is set to stone. So If you think
>>>>>>> that it is safe to be removed and nobody can hit this, I'm okay for
>>>>>>> removing that option. Maybe we should at least wrote it to release notes
>>>>>>> (I'll let Honza to express his feelings as API versioning/compatibility
>>>>>>> sensei)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMHO it is safe to remove.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And you forgot to increment api version in VERSION file
>>>>> Updated patch attached, with a VERSION change.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ACK
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there any ticket for this?
>> As I wrote in the commit message and in the email,
>> it is part of https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5354
>>
> Sorry I misread that ticket in the commit message, because ipatool was unable
> to parse it from commit message
> 
> Pushed to master: 185806432d6dfccc5cdd73815471ce60a575b073

I see no link to this ticket in the commit message in
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/freeipa.git/commit/?id=185806432d6dfccc5cdd73815471ce60a575b073
Did you push old version of this patch?

In general, I would suggest using the patch format from
http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Patch_Format
It makes automation easier...

Martin

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to