On 14.06.2016 16:27, Martin Basti wrote:
On 09.06.2016 12:42, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
On 06/07/2016 08:56 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Thank you, Thierry. Reduced the 100k locks to 50k locks in the patch
On 06/06/2016 07:23 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 03.06.2016 13:38, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
LGTM and works for me, but I want ack from thierry because of the
The attached patch implements solution to
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5914. The patch is rather
hacky as nsslapd-db-locks requires to be modified when DS is not
running although I accept proposals for better solution.
* value set by this patch is 100K, it is okay or should be rather
50K as is mentioned in the ticket
* should be upgrade for this change, or should be this done only
for new installations? (patch solves new installations only and I
don't think that we should change it by upgrade, users may have
already tuned DS)
This value also depends of the data. For example adding groups with
10K members spikes the dblock consumption up to 40K because of
membership computation during the update.
The size of the entries can also contribute if for example we have
several entries per page or they are too large and fit on several
IMHO we should support out of the box groups with 10K, so
'nsslapd-db-locks: 50000' looks good to me.
However it could be documented why it can consum so much lock and
how to tune it.
ACK, I will push it later
Pushed to master: 8e3b7b24c1bec5b7e2519e7c9466e3c336f9a409
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code