On 07/01/2016 10:38 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 03/08/2016 06:02 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 17:20 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/08/2016 05:00 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/08/2016 04:49 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 14:23 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 12/01/2015 10:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 11/30/2015 07:42 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 10:33 +0100, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 11/24/2015 10:20 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
This addresses #3860, giving admins the option to not
require preauth
for Hosts and services.

I did not add this option by default, although it does
reduce the load
on the KDC as well as speed up TGT acquisition for service
accounts that acquire TGTs.

Tested and working as expected (SPNs are not returned
error while normal users are).


Hi Simo,

I was not able to apply the patch on current master branch:

git am


Applying: Allow admins to disable preauth for SPNs.
error: invalid object 100644
for 'ipalib/plugins/config.py'
fatal: git-write-tree: error building trees
Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
Patch failed at 0001 Allow admins to disable preauth for SPNs.

It seems that I nedd to apply some of your other patches
first (which one?)

Sorry did not see this question earlier, it requires 556 and
557, I just
bumped that thread.


It seems that I need something else, patch 556-2 applies
cleanly, but
patch 557-3 fails with http://fpaste.org/296230/89819431/ on
both master
and 4-2 branch.

Rebased 556,557 in their thread, and here is the rebase for 558
on top
of them.


ACK. I'm afraid that this patch and 556, 557 will require another
of rebase before pushing, though.

Rebased on top of master (not on 556/557) per Petr's request.


NACK, if you do API changes please increment API version in VERSION.

Why wasn't this a problem in the previous ACK ?


Probably because I missed it, sorry.



Thanks, ACK.

was this pushed?

Yes I see 3e45c9be0aefb03751665a951f426ac59c50a551 in master.

Martin^3 Babinsky

Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to