On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 13:02 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Nathaniel McCallum <npmccal...@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 14:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > > On 09/23/2016 09:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > As you know, FedoraHosted.org will be decommissioned.
> > > > >  https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedorahosted-sunset-
> > > > > 2017
> > > > > -02-28/
> > > > > 
> > > > > We use Trac instance there. Let's discuss where we should
> > > > > migrate
> > > > > and what are our requirements. Then put results on one place.
> > > > > For
> > > > > that I've created:  
> > > > > http://www.freeipa.org/page/FedoraHosted_Migration
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > That you for writing this up, there are some good points I
> > > > didn't
> > > > think about, like migrating the ticket numbers. Did you already
> > > > file
> > > > an issue that tracks this in Pagure (or asked if this is
> > > > already
> > > > possible)?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I think the achieving the same ticket numbers should not be
> > > difficult. During the migration, we would just need to make sure
> > > we
> > > insert dummy Pagure/Github/... tickets on when the original
> > > ticket
> > > was deleted, like
> > > 
> > > https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2
> > 
> > 
> > A pro for github is that migration tools exist. This is a con for
> > pagure.
> 
> 
> Much as I want github... a migration tool does exist to go to pagure:
> https://pagure.io/pagure-importer/ I have used it (on the gssproxy
> fedorahosted as a test) and while I did not like it it did get the
> job
> done eventually.

Thanks for the correction. I didn't see that the last time I looked.

Nathaniel

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Reply via email to