Hello,The option specifies the value of 'objectclass' attribute during the GER. That is evaluated at attributeLevelRights but not at the entryLevelRights. I was not able to fix the test case using this option.
For information I opened that ticket https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6609
thanks thierry On 01/13/2017 11:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,if you look at: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/Viewing_the_ACIs_for_an_Entry-Get_Effective_Rights_Control.html#ex-ger-non-entrythen it looks like you can provide GER a bit of information eg objectclass of the new entry, so that the existing aci would be selected. Maybe can_add can be extended.Ludwig On 01/13/2017 09:12 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:Hi Fraser,I failed to reproduce you test case, I mean the aci granted the add right to a group member to ADD an entry with the filtered attribute. Now I have a doubt to test attribute valule on an entry that does not yet exist.Would you run /usr/lib64/mozldap/ldapsearch -D "cn=directory manager" W -b "cn=cas,cn=ca,dc=ipa,dc=local " -J "188.8.131.52.184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11:true:dn:uid=alice,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=local" "(objectclass=*)"to get the effective rights under cn=cas,cn=ca,dc=ipa,dc=localAlso you may replay your test case with ACL logs (http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#Troubleshooting), nsslapd-errorlog-level: 262272thanks thierry On 01/13/2017 07:21 AM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:In ca_add.pre_callback, we have: if not ldap.can_add(dn[1:]): raise ACIError(...) `can_add' uses the GetEffectiveRights control to see what rights the user has. When a user with the 'System: Add CA' permission attempts to add a CA, the above ACIError gets raised. This is definitely a bug. I think it is a bug in DS GetEffectiveRights code. The ACI in play is: dn: cn=cas,cn=ca,dc=ipa,dc=localaci: (targetfilter = "(objectclass=ipaca)")(version 3.0;acl "permission:System : Add CA";allow (add) groupdn = "ldap:///cn=System: Add CA,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=ipa,dc=local";) ... The user definitely has the right membership: dn: uid=alice,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=local memberof: cn=ipausers,cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=local memberof: cn=CA Administrator,cn=roles,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=localmemberof: cn=LWCA Administration,cn=privileges,cn=pbac,dc=ipa,dc=localmemberof: cn=System: Add CA,cn=permissions,cn=pbac,dc=ipa,dc=local William suggested I check whether direct vs. indirect membership made a difference. It does not. A wild guess is that the algorithm that computes whether the subject has add access under the given entry does not take the targetfilter into account. To solve, perhaps we could ignore ACI targetfilter when computing add access for GER. Alternatively, is there another way for a user to determine if they can add an entry at a particular place, without actually doing the add? Thanks, Fraser
-- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code