On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:59:49AM +0100, David Kupka wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> I would like to bring your attention to just published PRs implementing
> FreeIPA part of Certificate Identity Mapping feature :
> - certmap plugin  by Flo
> - WebUI for certmap plugin  by Pavel
> - tests for certmap plugin  by me
> Also please think about names of the commands, parameters, entries and
> attributes. We've figured them somehow but if you have any suggestion that
> would improve the understanding please share.
thank you for the patches.
Just a general comment about an open question in the design. Honza
suggested to use a priority instead of an issuer name to make sure that
only specific rules are used for a given issuer. The latest mail in the
thread about it is
Do you have any opinions here?
I think it won't change much in your patches but we should find an
agreement before e.g. the OID are registered.
> Please review them thoroughly, thanks!
>  https://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Certificate_Identity_Mapping
>  https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/398
>  https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/399
>  https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/400
> David Kupka
> Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
> Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code