Alex Corcoles via FreeIPA-users <>

> Maybe this is a bug in the definition of gssproxy? Should it be a Wants=
> instead of a Requires=?

No, it's a bug I will have fixed in 7.5.  The requirement needs to be
from proc-fs-nfsd on gssproxy, not the other way around, because
gssproxy doesn't require nfs-utils to be present in order to operate.

More information:


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

FreeIPA-users mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

Reply via email to