Ben Archuleta via FreeIPA-users wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > I am currently rolling out a FreeIPA based solution to replace a NIS behind a > NAT that’s deteriorating. As I look at the implementation of FreeIPA I was > wondering, is it better to use the DNS server thats part of FreeIPA or to use > Bind. The new NAT doesn’t yet have a set design so I can implement DNS in > whatever form is necessary. > > Topology: > > NAT: x.my.wonderful.domain > IPA:ipa0.my.wonderful.domian > IPA:ipa1.my.wonderful.domain > > Then 250 workstations live behind the NAT.
I don't know that one is better than another. Integrated DNS can make some things easier like automatically creating and managing the SRV entries needed for autodiscovery but many users manage DNS outside of IPA. rob _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org