On 14/02/2020 12:32, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On pe, 14 helmi 2020, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I did something pretty vanilla: >> >> $ ipa-adtrust-install --unattended --admin-password=xxx >> >> Process showed first some warning about "unattended" but >> then this: >> >> Configuring CIFS >> [1/24]: validate server hostname >> [2/24]: stopping smbd >> [3/24]: creating samba domain object >> [4/24]: retrieve local idmap range >> [5/24]: creating samba config registry >> [6/24]: writing samba config file >> [7/24]: adding cifs Kerberos principal >> [8/24]: adding cifs and host Kerberos principals to the >> adtrust agents >> group >> [9/24]: check for cifs services defined on other replicas >> [10/24]: adding cifs principal to S4U2Proxy targets >> [11/24]: adding admin(group) SIDs >> [12/24]: adding RID bases >> [13/24]: updating Kerberos config >> 'dns_lookup_kdc' already set to 'true', nothing to do. >> [14/24]: activating CLDAP plugin >> [15/24]: activating sidgen task >> [16/24]: map BUILTIN\Guests to nobody group >> [17/24]: configuring smbd to start on boot >> [18/24]: adding special DNS service records >> [19/24]: restarting Directory Server to take MS PAC and >> LDAP plugins >> changes into account >> [20/24]: adding fallback group >> [21/24]: adding Default Trust View >> [22/24]: setting SELinux booleans >> [23/24]: starting CIFS services >> ipaserver.install.adtrustinstance: CRITICAL CIFS services >> failed to start >> [24/24]: restarting smbd >> Done configuring CIFS. >> >> Now, Samba would not start and I wonder what that might >> have to do with >> the above: >> >> tarting Samba SMB Daemon... >> [2020/02/14 11:21:34.801358, 0] >> ../../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:171(make_pdb_method_name) >> >> No builtin nor plugin backend for ipasam found >> smb.service: Main process exited, code=exited, >> status=1/FAILURE >> smb.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. >> Failed to start Samba SMB Daemon. >> >> Or is is it unrelated? Hot to troubleshoot & fix it? >> >> I'm on Centos 8 with >> ipa-server-4.8.0-13.module_el8.1.0+265+e1e65be4.x86_64 > > There was an issue in CentOS 8.1 build that ipa was built > before samba > was build and thus ABI was different and failed. > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16929 > > Okey. Does it mean that only IPA would have to be re/built? Any other things which need special attention?
many thanks, L. _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
