Thanks Flo,

Yes! That's the one.

Anyway, back to ipahealthcheck. How can we improve it so that users don't have 
to struggle
with pdb in discovering what is actually wrong? ("we" => Rob :-)

Only because I came across the following I was able to see the problem using 
dsconf.

(Pdb) print(result['fix'])
While conflict entries are expected to occur in an MMR environment, they
should be resolved.  In regards to conflict entries there is always the 
original/counterpart
entry that has a normal DN, and then the conflict version of that entry.  
Technically both
entries are valid, you as the administrator, needs to decide which entry you 
want to keep.
First examine/compare both entries to determine which one you want to keep or 
remove.  You
can use the CLI tool "dsconf" to resolve the conflict.  Here is an example:

    List the conflict entries:

        # dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM  repl-conflict list dc=example,dc=com

    Examine conflict entry and its counterpart entry:

        # dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM  repl-conflict compare <DN of conflict entry>

    Remove conflict entry and keep only the original/counterpart entry:

        # dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM  repl-conflict delete <DN of conflict entry>

    Replace the original/counterpart entry with the conflict entry:

        # dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM  repl-conflict swap <DN of conflict entry>


BTW. LDAP (and ldapsearch) remains a mystery to me. How can a less restrictive 
filter
show less results?
-- Kees

On 12-07-2021 09:41, Florence Renaud wrote:
The correct search filter must include (objectClass=ldapSubEntry):

ldapsearch -H ldaps://linge.example.com <http://linge.example.com> -W -D 
'cn=Directory Manager' -b 'o=ipaca' 
'(&(objectClass=ldapSubEntry)(nsds5ReplConflict=*))' nsds5ReplConflict

HTH,
flo

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 3:20 PM Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 09-07-2021 21:33, Rob Crittenden wrote:
    > Kees Bakker via FreeIPA-users wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> ipahealthcheck gives me this warning
    >>
    >> [
    >>    {
    >>      "source": "ipahealthcheck.ds.replication",
    >>      "check": "ReplicationCheck",
    >>      "result": "WARNING",
    >>      "uuid": "237f4271-6e93-4d42-a15d-accdb936e51b",
    >>      "when": "20210709182051Z",
    >>      "duration": "45.967890",
    >>      "kw": {
    >>        "key": "DSREPLLE0002",
    >>        "items": [
    >>          "Replication",
    >>          "Conflict Entries"
    >>        ],
    >>        "msg": "There were 1 conflict entries found under the replication
    >> suffix \"o=ipaca\"."
    >>      }
    >>    }
    >> ]
    >>
    >>
    >> ldapsearch does not reveal any hit, however nsconf does.
    >>
    >>
    >> [root@linge ~]# ldapsearch -H ldaps://linge.example.com 
<http://linge.example.com> -W -D
    >> 'cn=Directory Manager' -b 'o=ipaca' '(nsds5ReplConflict=*)'
    >> Enter LDAP Password:
    >> # extended LDIF
    >> #
    >> # LDAPv3
    >> # base <o=ipaca> with scope subtree
    >> # filter: (nsds5ReplConflict=*)
    >> # requesting: ALL
    >> #
    >>
    >> # search result
    >> search: 2
    >> result: 0 Success
    >>
    >> # numResponses: 1
    >>
    >>
    >> [root@linge ~]# dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM repl-conflict list o=ipaca
    >> dn:
    >> 
cn=iparep4.example.com:443+nsuniqueid=ee993401-84ef11eb-93f498e2-54354ddc,cn=CAList,ou=Security
    >> Domain,o=ipaca
    >> Clone: TRUE
    >> DomainManager: TRUE
    >> SecureAdminPort: 443
    >> SecureAgentPort: 443
    >> SecureEEClientAuthPort: 443
    >> SecurePort: 443
    >> SubsystemName: CA iparep4.example.com <http://iparep4.example.com> 8443
    >> UnSecurePort: 80
    >> cn: iparep4.example.com:443 <http://iparep4.example.com:443>
    >> host: iparep4.example.com <http://iparep4.example.com>
    >> nsds5replconflict: namingConflict (ADD)
    >> cn=iparep4.example.com:443 
<http://iparep4.example.com:443>,cn=calist,ou=security domain,o=ipaca
    >> objectClass: top
    >> objectClass: pkiSubsystem
    >> objectClass: ldapsubentry
    >>
    >>
    >> How is that possible?
    > 389 filters out conflict entries now. Add this filter and you should see
    > it with ldapsearch:
    >
    > (&(!(objectclass=nstombstone))(nsds5ReplConflict=*))
    >

    That makes no difference. Both BASEDN and o=ipaca result in no hits.
    (( Can ldapsearch really filter out more if the filter expression is less 
restrictive? ))

    [root@linge ~]# ldapsearch -H ldaps://linge.example.com 
<http://linge.example.com> -W -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -b 'o=ipaca' 
'(&(!(objectclass=nstombstone))(nsds5ReplConflict=*))'
    Enter LDAP Password:
    # extended LDIF
    #
    # LDAPv3
    # base <o=ipaca> with scope subtree
    # filter: (&(!(objectclass=nstombstone))(nsds5ReplConflict=*))
    # requesting: ALL
    #

    # search result
    search: 2
    result: 0 Success

    # numResponses: 1

    [root@linge ~]# ldapsearch -H ldaps://linge.example.com 
<http://linge.example.com> -W -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -b $BASEDN 
'(&(!(objectclass=nstombstone))(nsds5ReplConflict=*))'
    Enter LDAP Password:
    # extended LDIF
    #
    # LDAPv3
    # base <dc=example,dc=com> with scope subtree
    # filter: (&(!(objectclass=nstombstone))(nsds5ReplConflict=*))
    # requesting: ALL
    #

    # search result
    search: 2
    result: 0 Success

    # numResponses: 1

-- Kees
    _______________________________________________
    FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
    To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
    Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
    List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] 
<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]>
    Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 
<https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>


_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to