You're absolutely right. On Debian in /etc/pam.d/common-auth we have: # here are the per-package modules (the "Primary" block) auth [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_sss.so use_first_pass # here's the fallback if no module succeeds auth requisite pam_deny.so # prime the stack with a positive return value if there isn't one already; # this avoids us returning an error just because nothing sets a success code # since the modules above will each just jump around auth required pam_permit.so # and here are more per-package modules (the "Additional" block) auth optional pam_cap.so # end of pam-auth-update config
A quick hack that removes pam_unix.so and removes the use_first_pass line from pam_sssd.so results in the OTP prompts being produced by pam_sssd. Thanks! I've filed https://bugs.debian.org/1001644 to discuss whether pam_sss can be moved before pam_unix in the Debian packaging. -- Sam Morris <https://robots.org.uk/> PGP: rsa4096/CAAA AA1A CA69 A83A 892B 1855 D20B 4202 5CDA 27B9 _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
