Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:46 AM Kathy Zhu via FreeIPA-users > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On a different topic, we started migration from Centos 7 to Red Hat 8.6 > over the weekend, after adding the first Red Hat master and moved CA renewal > and CRL generation roles to it, then we tried to add the second Red Hat > master via the first Red Hat master, after many tries without success. The > keytabs on the first master seem messed up. We wonder if it is possible or > safe to back out. > > The current domain is all Centos 7 masters and one Red Hat 8 master with > CA renewal and CRL generation role. By backing out, I mean to move the CA > renewal and CRL generation role back to a Centos 7 master, then remove the > Red Hat 8 master. So we will be back to the way before the migration. Then we > have a freshly installed red hat server and try the migration process again. > > Is this safe to do? > > Hi, > I don't see any issue with moving back CA renewal and CRL generation > roles back to the Centos 7 server. But maybe you can share the failed > installation logs for us to help you troubleshoot the replica > installation issue?
The connection log inside the ipareplica-install log you shared doesn't include the cn error you shared later. It's a strange failure. The no session_cookie failure is expected since this principal hasn't authenticated yet, but the No valid Negotiate header isn't. I don't know why the RPC client wouldn't send that. Were you using the --server option to ipa-replica-install to control which server to connect with? rob > > flo > > Thanks. > > Kathy. > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:18 PM Kathy Zhu wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thank you! > > We are migrating to Red Hat 8.6, that master will be replaced. > So far, we do not see any issue yet. > > The outputs from "dsconf slapd-EXAMPLE-COM repl-conflict list > o=ipaca" are binaries. Have no clue what that means :-). > > Many thanks for your help! It made our domain cleaner. > Appreciate it. > > Kathy. > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:03 PM Rob Crittenden > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Kathy Zhu via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > > Thank you! > > > > It worked! There were 4 bad entries! However, I made a > mistake by > > deleting a valid one :-(. Could you please share how to > add it back? Or > > should I reinstall it? > > I don't know how to re-add one or what repercussions there > are (the CA > is still treated very much like a black box). Re-installing > is the > safest bet. > > > > > ipa-healthcheck is no longer complain about the same. > However, I still > > see the warning: > > > > # ipa-healthcheck --failures-only --output-type=human > > > > Unhandler rdtype 256 > > > > Unhandler rdtype 256 > > > > Unhandler rdtype 256 > > ... > > > > Unhandler rdtype 256 > > > > WARNING: > ipahealthcheck.ds.replication.ReplicationCheck.DSREPLLE0002: > > There were 118 conflict entries found under the > replication suffix > > "dc=corp,dc=nuro,dc=team". > > > > WARNING: > ipahealthcheck.ds.replication.ReplicationCheck.DSREPLLE0002: > > There were 15 conflict entries found under the replication > suffix "o=ipaca". > > # > > > > Note the last line : > > > > There were 15 conflict entries found under the replication > suffix "o=ipaca". > > > > We have 11 valid ones plus 4 old removed ones, that is > total 15. > > Somewhere in IPA still shows 15. > > They must be there somewhere. It is a 389-ds check that > returns these > results. I'd try: dsconf slapd-YOUR_INSTANCE repl-conflict > list o=ipaca > > rob > > > > > Many thanks. > > > > Kathy. > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 7:24 PM Rob Crittenden > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > > > > Kathy Zhu via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > We are migrating from Centos 7 IPA to Red Hat 8.6. > After adding the > > > first Red Hat master, it reported error: > > > > > > > > > # ipa-healthcheck > > > > --source=pki.server.healthcheck.clones.connectivity_and_data > > > > > > Internal server error > HTTPSConnectionPool(host='ipa4.example.com > <http://ipa4.example.com> > > <http://ipa4.example.com> > > > <http://ipa4.example.com>', port=443): Max retries > exceeded with url: > > > /ca/rest/certs/search?size=3 (Caused by > > > > NewConnectionError('<urllib3.connection.VerifiedHTTPSConnection > object > > > at 0x7f0611b6d5c0>: Failed to establish a new > connection: [Errno -2] > > > Name or service not known',)) > > > > > > [ > > > > > > { > > > > > > "source": > "pki.server.healthcheck.clones.connectivity_and_data", > > > > > > "check": "ClonesConnectivyAndDataCheck", > > > > > > "result": "ERROR", > > > > > > "uuid": "bfb9aeac-2e86-4d1d-ac2a-3cb62300527e", > > > > > > "when": "20220711221016Z", > > > > > > "duration": "0.768881", > > > > > > "kw": { > > > > > > "status": "ERROR: pki-tomcat : Internal error > testing CA clone. > > > Host: ipa4.example.com <http://ipa4.example.com> > <http://ipa4.example.com> > > <http://ipa4.example.com> Port: 443" > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > ] > > > > > > # > > > > > > > > > ipa4 was a master we had years ago. it did not show > up as a dangling > > > master in the domain. However, it remains in pki DB. > How to safely > > clean > > > it out from pki DB? > > > > IPA wasn't cleaning up the security domain on server > removal until > > relatively recently. > > > > You can find the list of servers with: > > > > # pki securitydomain-host-find > > > > You can remove one with with: > > > > # pki -d /etc/pki/pki-tomcat/alias/ -n 'subsystemCert > cert-pki-ca' -C > > /etc/pki/pki-tomcat/alias/pwdfile.txt > securitydomain-host-del 'CA > > ipa.example.test 443' > > > > Be very careful as you can remove valid ones just as > easily. > > > > > Another interesting fact I like to point out - Centos 7 > > ipa-healthcheck > > > does not report this. > > > > The epel-7 build of ipa-healthcheck I did was a > one-off. The differences > > were just too great to keep it in sync. It's an > incentive to upgrade to > > RHEL 8 (or 9). > > > > rob > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
