On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 10:23 -0500, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-users
wrote:
> 
> It's in the blog. ipa iprange-find. That along with the range of
> already
> issued ids will give you an idea of what the available ranges are.

I see.  Mine reports:

# ipa idrange-find                                                    
----------------
2 ranges matched
----------------
  Range name: INTERLINX.BC.CA_id_range
  First Posix ID of the range: 396000000
  Number of IDs in the range: 200000
  First RID of the corresponding RID range: 1000
  First RID of the secondary RID range: 100000000
  Range type: local domain range

  Range name: INTERLINX.BC.CA_subid_range
  First Posix ID of the range: 2147483648
  Number of IDs in the range: 2147352576
  First RID of the corresponding RID range: 2147283648
  Domain SID of the trusted domain: S-1-5-21-738065-838566-2194680828
  Range type: Active Directory domain range
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 2
----------------------------

So I just need to use any range other than 396000000-396199999?  Even
though no IPA server exists (any more) with that range?

> Take your pick. dnarange-show/set make it easier to change the
> settings
> and is what I'd use.

So given the above:

# ipa-replica-manage dnanextrange-set server.interlinx.bc.ca 396200000-396399999

should be what I want?

And I can't/don't want to just reassign the existing 396000000-
396199999 range given that there is no other IPA server in this network
at this point?

Cheers,
b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to