Hi,

On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 2:31 PM TomK via FreeIPA-users <
freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote:

> GM Folks!
>
> Getting the following:
>
>
> [S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517-1104] has a RID that is
> larger than the ldap_idmap_range_size.
>
> However, my ID range is, or was, 200,000 and there were no changes on
> this IPA 4.6.6 / CentOS 7 server in years.
>
>
> A few messages surrounding the above:
>
>
>    26238 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_process_result] (0x2000): Trace: sh[0x564bbffeced0], connected[1],
> ops[0x564bc0031710], ldap[0x564bc00049c0]
>    26239 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_process_message] (0x4000): Message type: [LDAP_RES_SEARCH_REFERENCE]
>    26240 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_get_generic_ext_add_references] (0x1000): Additional References:
> ldap://mds.xyz/CN=Configuration,DC=mds,DC=xyz
>    26241 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_process_result] (0x2000): Trace: sh[0x564bbffeced0], connected[1],
> ops[0x564bc0031710], ldap[0x564bc00049c0]
>    26242 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_process_message] (0x4000): Message type: [LDAP_RES_SEARCH_RESULT]
>    26243 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_get_generic_op_finished] (0x0400): Search result: Success(0), no
> errmsg set
>    26244 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_op_destructor] (0x2000): Operation 5 finished
>    26245 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [generic_ext_search_handler] (0x4000): Request included referrals which
> were ignored.
>    26246 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [generic_ext_search_handler] (0x4000):     Ref:
> ldap://ForestDnsZones.mds.xyz/DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=mds,DC=xyz
>    26247 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [generic_ext_search_handler] (0x4000):     Ref:
> ldap://DomainDnsZones.mds.xyz/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mds,DC=xyz
>    26248 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [generic_ext_search_handler] (0x4000):     Ref:
> ldap://mds.xyz/CN=Configuration,DC=mds,DC=xyz
>    26249 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_search_user_process] (0x0400): Search for users, returned 1 results.
>    26250 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_search_user_process] (0x2000): Retrieved total 1 users
>    26251 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): start ldb transaction (nesting: 0)
>    26252 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_save_user] (0x0400): Save user
>    26253 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sss_domain_get_state] (0x1000): Domain nix.mds.xyz is Active
>    26254 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sss_domain_get_state] (0x1000): Domain mds.xyz is Active
>    26255 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_get_primary_name] (0x0400): Processing object tom
>    26256 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_save_user] (0x0400): Processing user t...@mds.xyz
>    26257 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_save_user] (0x1000): Mapping user [t...@mds.xyz] objectSID
> [S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517-1104] to unix ID
>    26258 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_idmap_sid_to_unix] (0x0040): Object SID
> [S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517-1104] has a RID that is
> larger than the ldap_idmap_range_size.         See the "ID MAPPING"
> section of sssd-ad(5) for an explanation of how to resolve this issue.
>    26259 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_idmap_sid_to_unix] (0x0080): Could not convert objectSID
> [S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517-1104] to a UNIX ID
>    26260 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_save_user] (0x0020): Failed to save user [t...@mds.xyz]
>    26261 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_save_users] (0x0040): Failed to store user 0. Ignoring.
>    26262 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0)
>    26263 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_get_users_done] (0x4000): Saving 1 Users - Done
>    26264 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_id_op_done] (0x4000): releasing operation connection
>    26265 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): Added timed event "ldb_kv_callback": 0x564bc0021ee0
>    26266
>    26267 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): Added timed event "ldb_kv_timeout": 0x564bc0023580
>    26268
>    26269 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): Running timer event 0x564bc0021ee0 "ldb_kv_callback"
>    26270
>    26271 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): Destroying timer event 0x564bc0023580 "ldb_kv_timeout"
>    26272
>    26273 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]] [ldb]
> (0x4000): Destroying timer event 0x564bc0021ee0 "ldb_kv_callback"
>    26274
>    26275 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sysdb_search_by_name] (0x0400): No such entry
>    26276 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [ipa_get_ad_acct_ad_part_done] (0x0080): Object not found, ending request
>    26277 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [sdap_id_op_destroy] (0x4000): releasing operation connection
>    26278 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_req_done] (0x0400): DP Request [Account #1]: Request handler
> finished [0]: Success
>    26279 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [_dp_req_recv] (0x0400): DP Request [Account #1]: Receiving request data.
>    26280 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_req_reply_list_success] (0x0400): DP Request [Account #1]: Finished.
> Success.
>    26281 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_req_reply_std] (0x1000): DP Request [Account #1]: Returning
> [Success]: 0,0,Success
>    26282 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_table_value_destructor] (0x0400): Removing
> [0:1:0x0001:1::mds.xyz:name=t...@mds.xyz] from reply table
>    26283 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_req_destructor] (0x0400): DP Request [Account #1]: Request removed.
>    26284 (Mon Aug  4 07:42:50 2025) [sssd[be[nix.mds.xyz]]]
> [dp_req_destructor] (0x0400): Number of active DP request: 0
>
>
> Ranges, after increasing to 2,000,000:
>
>
> ipa idrange-find mds.xyz_id_range
> ----------------
> 2 ranges matched
> ----------------
>    Range name: MDS.XYZ_id_range
>    First Posix ID of the range: 155600000
>    Number of IDs in the range: 2000000
>    First RID of the corresponding RID range: 155600000
>    Domain SID of the trusted domain:
> S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517
>    Range type: Active Directory domain range
>
>
The SID S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517-1104 corresponds to a
domain SID S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517 and a RID 1104.
Domain sid falls into the range MDS.XYZ_id_range which has rids
between 155600000
and 155600000+2000000 => 1004 is outside of the rid range.

Did you manually create or modify this AD range?
flo

>    Range name: NIX.MDS.XYZ_id_range
>    First Posix ID of the range: 1746600000
>    Number of IDs in the range: 200000
>    First RID of the corresponding RID range: 1000
>    First RID of the secondary RID range: 100000000
>    Range type: local domain range
> ----------------------------
> Number of entries returned 2
> ----------------------------
>
>
> ipa trust-show mds.xyz
>    Realm name: mds.xyz
>    Domain NetBIOS name: MDS
>    Domain Security Identifier: S-1-5-21-1803828911-4163023034-2461700517
>    Trust direction: Two-way trust
>    Trust type: Active Directory domain
>
>
>
> sssd.conf
>
>
> [domain/nix.mds.xyz]
> debug_level = 9
> cache_credentials = True
> krb5_store_password_if_offline = True
> ipa_domain = nix.mds.xyz
> id_provider = ipa
> auth_provider = ipa
> access_provider = ipa
> ipa_hostname = idmipa01.nix.mds.xyz
> chpass_provider = ipa
> ipa_server = idmipa01.nix.mds.xyz
> ipa_server_mode = True
> ldap_tls_cacert = /etc/ipa/ca.crt
> sudo_provider = ipa
> ldap_sudo_search_base = ou=sudoers,dc=nix,dc=mds,dc=xyz
> lookup_family_order = ipv4_only
> [domain/sudoproxy]
> debug_level = 9
> id_provider = proxy
> proxy_lib_name = files
> ldap_uri = ldap://idmipa01.nix.mds.xyz, ldap://idmipa02.nix.mds.xyz
> proxy_pam_target = system-auth-ac
> sudo_provider = ipa
> ldap_sudo_search_base = ou=sudoers,dc=nix,dc=mds,dc=xyz
> ipa_domain = nix.mds.xyz
> [sssd]
> debug_level = 9
> services = nss, ifp, sudo, ssh, pam
> config_file_version = 2
> domains = sudoproxy, nix.mds.xyz
> [nss]
> debug_level = 9
> memcache_timeout = 600
> homedir_substring = /home
> [pam]
> debug_level = 9
> [sudo]
> debug_level = 9
> [autofs]
> [ssh]
> [pac]
> debug_level = 9
> [ifp]
> allowed_uids = ipaapi, root
>
>
>
> I do not have any specific ID ranges defined in /etc/sssd/sssd.conf.
> Tried to modify the ranges using:
>
>
> ipa idrange-mod --base-id=1746600000 --range-size=2000000
> NIX.MDS.XYZ_id_range
>
>
> But not surprisingly, it doesn't fix the above issue.  Not surprisingly,
> at least based on my reading, because 200000 should be plenty for 1104.
>
> Looking for some hints and tips to get past this?  I did keep a backup
> of the IPA servers with a cache that was working off the second node.
> But after modifications to the RID ranges above, this second node also
> stopped working.  First host basically just stopped working on it's own,
> and second host stopped working after I modified the ID range to
> 2,000,000.  Perhaps updates on the AD servers caused the issue?
>
> Please let me know if more info is needed.
>
> --
> Thx,
> Tom
>
> P.S.  Have started looking at upgrades to a higher version of IPA,
> though that broke on current IPA server due to certs not having proper
> SAN values.  Different story though.  ;)
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
-- 
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to