Ryan Thomson wrote:
Wow, I need to improve my search skills:
http://freeipa.org/page/IPAv2_alpha2
My answer is at the bottom of the page!
My apologies, everyone.
No worries.
We're going to build this on a new feature in 389-ds, Managed Entries
(http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Managed_Entry_Design)
We need an enhancement in the DNA plugin to be able to keep the
uidNumber and gidNumber the same but the Managed Entries plugin does
most of the heavy lifting of avoiding race conditions for us already.
At this point we just need to wait for the next 389-ds release which
should be in the next few weeks. Once that is available we can create
our private groups.
rob
--Ryan
Ryan Thomson wrote:
Hi list,
I am wondering if FreeIPA is planning to conform to RHEL's user
private group (UPG) scheme? I think having an option to enable the UPG
scheme would be beneficial.
Adding a user to the v2 beta reveals that the UPG scheme is not
currently being followed with all new accounts auto-added to the
default "ipausers" group.
I noticed an older mailing list post by rob saying that UPG was being
investigated. Has there been any progress in that investigation? Any
decisions?
Thank you,
--Ryan
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
