Yeah it is:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago)
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Steven Jones <steven.jo...@vuw.ac.nz>wrote:
> but Im getting hammered by my management for instant answers.......they
> asked last night and expect an answer this morning.....and I'm expected to
> catch up and deploy several important solutions/projects all hinging on IPA
> 2.2 isnt in RHEL6.3 though?
> Anyway I will leave it longer, but Qs seem to drop off the list pretty
> Steven Jones
> Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
> Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
> 0064 4 463 6272
> From: Rob Crittenden [rcrit...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 June 2012 8:31 a.m.
> To: Steven Jones
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Do clients have to be in teh same DNS zone /
> FQDN as the IPA servers / Kerberos Realm?
> Steven Jones wrote:
> > I assume with no reply, now one knows?
> That's not really fair, it hasn't even been 24 hours.
> > My IPA servers are say ipa1 and 2.ipa.example.com
> > I have existing linux servers that I would rather not change the FQDN
> on, say server1.example.com Do I actually have to make the client
> server1.ipa.example.com or can I leave it as is at server1.example.com?
> Would that give any IPA problems? or is it just poor practice?
> Yes, you should be able to enroll server1.example.com into the
> ipa.example.com realm. You'll need a v2.2+ client for this to work. A
> patch was added (contributed by a user, actually) that will add a domain
> mapping to krb5.conf so this should work.
> Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users mailing list