On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden <rcrit...@redhat.com> wrote: > Stephen Ingram wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones <steven.jo...@vuw.ac.nz> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flat....Sounds like you >>> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhz....but when >>> "something" goes wrong such as replication failing that climbs...ditto >>> memory use.... >> >> >> Yes, I saw your conversation with Rich on this list about that. And, >> yes, 6.2 (2.1.3) was bad for me too. I'm not sure why 2.2.0 is still >> having issues. It was an upgrade from 2.1.3, but the upgrade seemed to >> complete without issue. I'm also not even doing replication yet so I'm >> not sure why memory is so high. Web interface is much slower too so >> perhaps something else is wrong. > > > Can you tell where it is being slow? Does it seem related to retrieving data > from LDAP?
I'm not really sure yet what is causing the slowness. I have the same number of directory entries as before the upgrade. It was very quick with 2.1.3, but once I upgraded, I felt like I was back to the pre-2.0 days--without a doubt much, much slower. > You might check your 389-ds access logs and look for searches with notes=U. > Perhaps you are missing an index. Yes there are lots of notes=U. What does this mean? Was something missed in the upgrade script? Steve _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipa-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users