On 09/17/2012 07:10 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
I understand that I'll lose users that are cn=Staff_Admins,dc=etc
So the Q is why I am losing users in the --win-subtree
cn=VUW_Staff,dc= etc
This I dont understand....
I have the -v already, anyway to make it very verbose?
http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting
Use the replication log level 8192
I'd like to see the directory server errors log
/var/log/dirsrv/slapd-DOMAIN/errors when winsync deletes entries under
the --win-subtree cn=VUW_Staff,dc= etc
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Rich Megginson [rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, 18 September 2012 12:47 p.m.
*To:* Steven Jones
*Cc:* freeipa-users@redhat.com
*Subject:* Re: [Freeipa-users] winsync agreement wipes IPA users
On 09/17/2012 06:17 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
The first time missed the --win-subtree settings so I wiped the
admins in the IPA admin group and users as they were not in cn=users
as per the bug. The second time as far as I can tell I specified the
correct cn via win-subtree flag but I still appear to have lost the
users in IPA.....now I expected to lose the admins but the loss of
users as well confounds me.
I did a ldapsearch as per checking and its seems to be saying the
right folder/ou/cn but IPA is empty.
Hence I was wondering if there was a log recording what the update
was doing so I could try and figure out the mistake. Ive tried
greping cant find any indication.
I will re-try with -v, verbose.
It is not clear from the manuals, but no matter what -win-subtree you
specify, winsync will search AD starting from the dc=domain suffix.
So, for example, if you have
cn=mystaff,cn=staff,dc=example,dc=com
and you specify
--win-subtree "cn=mystaff,cn=staff,dc=example,dc=com"
winsync will still search starting from dc=example,dc=com and will hit
ticket/355 if there are any users outside of
cn=mystaff,cn=staff,dc=example,dc=com that have the same username as a
user in IPA.
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Rich Megginson [rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, 18 September 2012 11:37 a.m.
*To:* Steven Jones
*Cc:* freeipa-users@redhat.com
*Subject:* Re: [Freeipa-users] winsync agreement wipes IPA users
On 09/17/2012 04:17 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to do a winsync agreement with specifying the AD point
as cn=VUW_Staff,dc=staff,dc=vuw,dc=vuw,dc=ac,dc=nz as my users are
not in the users folder but the VUW_Staff folder (at the same level)
and it wiped all IPA users that are also in AD.
Yes, this is what happens with https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
#355 winsync should not delete entry that appears to be out of scope
While doing the actual update does this get verbosly logged anywhere
as opposed to "update in progress" dumped to the screen? Something
went badly wrong, I just dont know what.
You are seeing something different than #355?
:/
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE
Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
0064 4 463 6272
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users