hi, yes, you are correct :-). Being a recent nfsv4 acls fan has made me forget that.
-- Groeten, natxo On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Ondrej Valousek <ondr...@s3group.cz> wrote: > Well, you do not need ACLs for that, just 'chmod g+s <directory>' will do. > But in general, I agree, this is insane requirement as nobody would ever > think of it in Windows. Not happy w/ a traditional Unix permissions? Go for > ACLs. > The only pity is that the current Posix-draft hack widely used on all > Linuxes is a mess and Rich-acl support is still nowhere in sight :-( > > Ondrej > > On 10/26/2012 09:07 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:11 PM, KodaK <sako...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We have many different development groups, but people can be members > of multiple groups. For collaboration, they'd like it when creating a > file to have that file have a group ownership of "foo" on machine-A, > but "bar" on machine-B. I'd like to help the end users do this > themselves so that I don't have to maintain separate files on each > machine (one of the reasons I put in IPA in the first place. :) ) > > I think what you need are filesystem acls. With acls you can specify > that new files in a dir structure will have predefined default groups > so all members of that particular group will be able to modify the > files. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipa-users mailing list > Freeipaemail@example.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipafirstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users