On 16/09/13 15:35, Simo Sorce wrote:


No, we need to update as it is used to unlock auto-locked accounts. What
we decided on was to not propagate any of these operations via
replication to avoid huge churn across all of the enterprise.

Simo.


The underlying issue is: with a large scale userbase, some method is needed to know about inactive user accounts.
Users that don't send/recv mails, users that don't bind/kinit, whatever..

 * some kind of attribute is needed to store when was the last activity.
* activity would mean a kerberos auth or ldap bind, or an attribute modification.
 * this last time info needs to be replicated.

This way, a policy like 'purge accounts inactive by 1 year' can be implemented.
Or even get a sorted list of user by inactivity time.

I think this is a very nice functionality that FreeIPA should have.

Best regards.

--
Arturo Borrero González
Departamento de Seguridad Informática (n...@cica.es)
Centro Informático Científico de Andalucía (CICA)
Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n - 41012 - Sevilla (Spain)
Tfno.: +34 955 056 600 / FAX: +34 955 056 650
Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo
Junta de Andalucía

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Reply via email to