On 11/06/2013 02:07 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 11/05/2013 04:34 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
>> On 11/05/2013 03:58 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2013 07:53 AM, Tamas Papp wrote:
>>>> On 11/05/2013 03:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47516
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been fixed upstream and in some releases - to allow
>>>>> replication to proceed despite excessive clock skew - what is your
>>>>> 389-ds-base version and platform?
>>>> What is the clock skewed? The date and time is the same on both
>>>> machines.
>>> VMs are notorious for having the clocks get out of sync - even
>>> temporarily.
>> Eventually you were right, it looks, that the problem is related to the
>> virtualization, thanks for the tip.
>>
>> Although I wouldn't say, it's because of messy VMs. It definitely must
>> be a software bug or misconfiguration, otherwise a VM should always
>> looks the same as a bare metal machine.
>>
>> Actually in my specific case I don't see the reason, why it is working
>> with   <clock offset='utc'/> and not with <clock offset='localtime'/> if
>> the time in the VM synchronized after bootup.
> You can file a ticket.

I'm not absolutely sure, that this was the root cause of the problem.

tamas

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Reply via email to