I took a look at the bugs page and I didn't see it mentioned, but I'm asking anyway:
is anyone aware of any client-side issues on fedora IRT IPA? We have some fedora workstations that auth against IPA in RHEL 6. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Alexander Bokovoy <aboko...@redhat.com>wrote: > Greetings! > > As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today, > Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading > your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check > Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs > for the complete list of issues. > > FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces > new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements, > unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in > Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain > conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations > due to these consequences. > > As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow > developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be > some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will appear in Fedora > 20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation. > > I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and packages > pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository. > > -- > / Alexander Bokovoy > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipa-users mailing list > Freeipa-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users > -- The government is going to read our mail anyway, might as well make it tough for them. GPG Public key ID: B6A1A7C6
_______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipa-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users