I took a look at the bugs page and I didn't see it mentioned, but I'm
asking anyway:

is anyone aware of any client-side issues on fedora IRT IPA?  We have some
fedora workstations that auth against IPA in RHEL 6.

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Alexander Bokovoy <aboko...@redhat.com>wrote:

> Greetings!
> As many of you are aware, Fedora Project releases Fedora 20 today,
> Tuesday, December 17th. This post serves as a warning against upgrading
> your FreeIPA deployments to Fedora 20 using release images. Please check
> Fedora 20 Common Bugs page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs
> for the complete list of issues.
> FreeIPA relies heavily on 389-ds Directory Server. Fedora 20 introduces
> new version series of 389-ds, 1.3.2.x. Along with multiple enhancements,
> unfortunately, few bugs went into the version currently available in
> Fedora 20 stable tree. These bugs are causing crashes under certain
> conditions and we don't recommend updating your existing configurations
> due to these consequences.
> As an update to the Fedora 20 Common Bugs page, over last night fellow
> developers from 389-ds and slapi-nis projects have fixed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043546 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732 but there will be
> some delay before the builds featuring the fixes will  appear in Fedora
> 20 updates repository. Remaining bugs are under investigation.
> I'll post an update note once we'll get remaining issues fixed and packages
> pushed to Fedora 20 updates repository.
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipa-users mailing list
> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

The government is going to read our mail anyway, might as well make it
tough for them.  GPG Public key ID:  B6A1A7C6
Freeipa-users mailing list

Reply via email to