Because it can happen that hostnames are used twice, but one for each network.
This sounds a little bit odd, but it has something todo with hostnames
that are needed, public names and internal names. But as both networks
have their own DNS servers, some records are just not provisioned so
need to be added manually to the non-managed server.
2015-06-29 17:11 GMT+02:00 Petr Spacek <pspa...@redhat.com>:
> On 29.6.2015 16:10, Matt . wrote:
>> Hi Petr,
>> Yes I understand why this is "not possible". The idea was to have a
>> managed DNS server from scripting and one for "other usage" by clients
>> who only need to know about the "unknown" records on Server1, this as
>> it should forward most and only do specific local lookups.
>> Your subdomain solution might be something if I want to go this way.
> I still do not understand the use case. Why not let scripts to modify records
> on one single server?
> Petr^2 Spacek
> Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
> Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project