On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, lejeczek wrote:
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:12 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:54:19AM +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > hi everyone
> >
> > there is a master IPA which in some weird way puts AD users into
> > its ldap
> > catalog. I say weird cause there is no trust nor other sync
> > established,
> > there was a trust agreement, one way type, but now 'trust-find'
> > shows
> > nothing, that trust was removed.
> >
> > but still when I create a user @AD DS a second later I see it in
> > IPA's ldap,
> > eg.
> >
> > dn: uid=ccnrt...@ccnr.aaa.private.dom,cn=users,cn=compat,dc=priva
> > te,dc=c
> > cnr,dc=aaa,dc=private,dc=dom
> >
> > how to trace the culprit config responsible for this?
>
> Check the DN, this is not the IPA tree (cn=account), but the compat
> tree
> (cn=compat) populated by the slapi-nis plugin. The intent is to
> make the
> AD users available to non-SSSD clients that can only use LDAP as an
> interface.
Yes. If you enabled slapi-nis on IPA master but didn't establish
actual
trust to AD and instead added an SSSD configuration to lookup AD
users
directly, then slapi-nis will happily ask SSSD for whatever users
with @
in the name were requested by the LDAP clients and SSSD would look
them
up in AD.
but would entries from AD wound up in IPA's ldap?
I'm poking around and still am puzzled, I believe I've enabled nis on a
replica but it's not doing it there, those AD users are not in IPA
replica ldap whereas they exist on the master.
They wouldn't be in LDAP tree.
cn=compat is purely virtual and is not replicated. The tree is populated
on demand and if your replica is configured differently to the master
w.r.t. AD trust or SSSD, you'll get different results.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
