On 23.02.2017 12:40, Peter Fern wrote:
On 23/02/17 20:27, Martin Basti wrote:
On 23.02.2017 10:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
And as you noticed, packaging nss-pem is not a trivial task because of
the way it uses private NSS api's that the libnss maintainer refuses to
make public.. OpenSSL, anyone? :P

We are working on it :) in future IPA may need only openssl
Doesn't this open the GPL/OpenSSL licensing can of worms (for distro !=
Fedora)?
IPA already requires OpenSSL so nothing should change.

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

Reply via email to