On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:36:20PM +0100, Iulian Roman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:59:12AM +0100, Iulian Roman wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Does anyone know what is the status with the support for AIX in the > > > pam_hbac tool ? I've heard from a RH presentation that it is available, > > > although on the project site it does not seem to be supported yet. > > > > > > I would like to know if there are any plans in that direction , because > > > our migrations of thousands of AIX machines to IPA is conditioned by the > > > availability of pam_hbac. The HBAC rules/policy design depends as well > > on > > > the method you use to parse the rules. > > > > It's in progress, but delayed due to the current work we are doing for > > RHEL-7.4. I've merged HP-UX support a couple of weeks ago and AIX > > support is next on the list. > > > > Any chance we can prioritize that by creating an RFE ? We have quite a > big environment and it would simplify a lot the access control if we can > make use of pam_hbac.
We already have: https://github.com/jhrozek/pam_hbac/issues/74 > > > If you'd like to help with the port, any help is appreciated :-) > > > > I am willing to , at least with testing it on different OS versions. If > there is anything else i can do , please let me know. Testing patches when there are would be nice. You can subscribe to the github issue to receive updates. -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project