19.04.2016, 14:41, Nicklas Björk kirjoitti: > On 2016-04-19 12:15, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> 19.04.2016, 11:28, Nicklas Björk kirjoitti: >>> Hi FreeIPA team, >>> >>> I was experimenting with the armhf packages, trying to get the FreeIPA >>> client to install on a Raspberry PI 3 / raspbian. The python-ipaclient >>> package seems to have a dependency for python-ipalib, which seems to be >>> included in the amd64 repository, but missing in the armhf repository. >>> Is this intentional, or is something missing? >> >> Missing where? Xenial at least should have it: >> >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipa/4.3.1-0ubuntu1/+build/9594558 >> >> >> > > I have added the FreeIPA PPA so my repo config is as follows: > deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/freeipa/ppa/ubuntu xenial main > deb http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ jessie main ui > > Trying to install the python-ipaclient I ended up with a dependency > problem, since the python-ipalib was missing. While investigating the > problem further, I discovered a difference between the repositories for > the armhf and amd64 architectures: > > wget -O- > http://ppa.launchpad.net/freeipa/ppa/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/binary-armhf/Packages.gz > | gunzip -c | grep "Package: python-ipalib" | wc -l > 0 > > wget -O- > http://ppa.launchpad.net/freeipa/ppa/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz > | gunzip -c | grep "Package: python-ipalib" | wc -l > 1 > > Perhaps I am mixing high and low with jessie and xenial, but I thought > it was a bit peculiar that there was a difference between the PPA > repositories.
That's because the ppa only has amd64 and i386 builders. Looks like python-ipalib should be arch:all anyway, will fix that in the next upload. and it's still unsupported to mix the ppa with anything older -- t _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~freeipa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~freeipa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
